Optimizing time-of-flight of PET/CT image quality via penalty β value in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing the image quality of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) systems is crucial for effective monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment planning in oncology. This study evaluates the impact of time-of-flight (TOF) on PET/CT performance, focusing on varying penalty β values within Q. Clear reconstruction algorithm. Methods: The study measured signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) using the Discovery MI PET/CT scanner and NEMA IQ phantom filled with the radiotracer fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). PET/CT scans were performed with and without TOF using β values of 100, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 3000. Pixel intensity values were measured using ImageJ software, and SNR and CNR were calculated. Results: Results indicated that increasing β values improved SNR and CNR for both non-TOF and TOF images. At a β value of 100, SNR and CNR increased across all sphere sizes (10 mm, 13 mm, 17 mm, 22 mm, 28 mm, 37 mm) when comparing non-TOF and TOF images. However, β values of 500 or higher led to decreased SNR and CNR, particularly in larger spheres (22 mm, 28 mm, 37 mm), when TOF was utilized. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of optimizing β values and employing TOF reconstruction in PET/CT scans to achieve the highest possible image quality. Implications for practice: In clinical practice, practitioners should adjust β values in accordance with routine protocols, considering the size of the target region and the use of TOF reconstruction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murat, H., Zulkifli, M. A. A., Said, M. A., Awang Kechik, M., Tahir, D., & Abdul Karim, M. K. (2025). Optimizing time-of-flight of PET/CT image quality via penalty β value in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Radiography, 31(1), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.12.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free