The serratus anterior plane block for analgesia after thoracic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails

53Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:The serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is a newer method that can be used in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries. The postoperative analgesia efficacy of SAP blocks for thoracic surgery remains controversial. We conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the analgesia of SAP blocks after thoracic surgery.Methods:We searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the postoperative pain control of a SAP block on thoracic surgery. All of the dates were screened and evaluated by two researchers and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software.Results:A total of 8 RCTs involving 542 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to postoperative pain scores at 2 h (standardized mean difference [Std.MD] = -1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.66 to -0.86; P < .0001); 6 h (SMD = -0.50; 95%CI = -0.88 to -0.11; P = .01); 12 h (SMD = -0.63; 95%CI = -1.10 to -0.16; P = .009); 24 h (SMD = -0.99; 95%CI = -1.44 to -0.51; P < .0001); postoperative opioid consumption at 24 h (SMD = -0.83; 95%CI = -1.10 to -0.56; P < .00001); and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) rates (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.21-0.73; P = .003).Conclusion:The SAP block can play an important role in the management of pain after thoracic surgery by reducing both pain scores and 24-h postoperative opioids consumption. In addition, there is fewer incidence of PONV in the SAP block group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, X., Song, T., Xu, H. Y., Chen, X., Yin, P., & Zhang, J. (2020). The serratus anterior plane block for analgesia after thoracic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Medicine (United States), 99(21). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free