How false is Kempe’s proof of the Four Color Theorem? Part II

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We continue the investigation of A. B. Kempe’s flawed proof of the Four Color Theorem from a computational and historical point of view. Kempe’s “proof” gives rise to an algorithmic method of coloring plane graphs that sometimes yields a proper vertex coloring requiring four or fewer colors. We investigate a recursive version of Kempe’s method and a modified version based on the work of I. Kittell. Then we empirically analyze the performance of the implementations on a variety of historically motivated benchmark graphs and explore the usefulness of simple randomization in four-coloring small plane graphs. We end with a list of open questions and future work.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gethner, E., Kallichanda, B., Mentis, A. S., Braudrick, S., Chawla, S., Clune, A., … Takano, N. (2009). How false is Kempe’s proof of the Four Color Theorem? Part II. Involve, 2(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.2140/involve.2009.2.249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free