Abstract
This introductory note discusses how the concept of securitisation might be used as a tool for understanding the different logics driving and standing behind foreign policies of major international stakeholders in situations of crises, emergencies and exceptions. The editors look at how securitisation functions as a discursive instrument for reshaping actors’ subjectivities, and how it might be adjusted to the rapid changes in global politics triggered by Russia’s war against Ukraine. They argue that the discursive construction of insecurities is not politically neutral and is driven by certain logics, presumptions and imaginaries. Russia’s war against Ukraine is a particularly important focal point in this regard since it elucidates another crucial question: how do the parties involved in the war securitise and de-securitise – as well as exceptionalise and normalise – specific risks, dangers and threats, and what are the implications of these discursive strategies for international security?
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Makarychev, A., & Diez, T. (2023). Introduction: Political Logics and Academic Rationalities of Securitisation and International Crises. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 17(2), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.51870/PEOW5184
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.