TRADISI TOLAK BALA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM (Studi Kasus di Desa Perkebunan Teluk Panji, Kecamatan Kampung Rakyat, Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Selatan)

Abstract

Islam regulates various aspects of life in worship, as a nation, as a state, in society and with the right beliefs. And Allah SWT sent down the Qur'an solely to be used as a guide for mankind, in order to live according to the truth. The purpose of this study is to provide a deeper understanding of the tradition of rejecting reinforcements. The problem examined in this study is how to implement the tradition of rejecting reinforcements and how Islamic law views the tradition of rejecting reinforcements. This study uses a type of field research (field research) using a qualitative method whose data source comes from information. The data collection method used is the interview method. The results of the research that the authors obtained show that: 1) The community's view of the tradition of rejecting reinforcements is the tradition of their predecessors. Most of the people who carry out the tradition of rejecting reinforcements are people who follow previous teachings that have become habits, teachings that have been taught from generation to generation by previous communities. The reason people carry out the tradition of rejecting reinforcements is to avoid an epidemic that can no longer be prevented, therefore the tradition of rejecting reinforcements is a form of effort by the people of the Teluk Panji Plantation Village to resist the plague. 2) According to the opinion of the fiqh scholars regarding urf including the Hanfiyah priests and Malikiyah urf something that has been considered good so that it has become a tradition in a society. Hanafiyah and Malikiyah scholars also argue with the hadith of the prophet "something that is considered good by Muslims, including something that It is also good according to Allah SWT. Meanwhile, according to Syafi'iyah and Hambali, they do not consider urf as a proof or a syar'i legal proposition. The Shafi'iyah group does not recognize the existence of ihtihsan, they avoid using legal instincts and do not use it as a proof. iyah refuses to use urf as a source of Islamic law.