Effect of bone grafting on postoperative wound infection and marginal necrosis in patients with calcane fractures

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of bone-transplantation over nonbone transplantation in treating intra-articular fractures of the heel bone on postsurgical complications. Our results were retrieved from the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The data of the injury of the patient and the wound infection were collected. Study were carried out with Revman 5.3 software. Eight operative trials associated with the implant of the heel were selected from a large number of publications. Among the 804 cases that needed operation on the heel, 410 cases were treated with bone grafting while 394 cases were not treated with the operation. Seven trials showed that there was no difference in the risk of post operative wound infection among patients who had received a bone-grafting operation on the heel or had not (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.51, 1.49 p = 0.62). There was no difference in the risk for post-operation marginal necrosis among patients who had received a bone-grafting operation on the heel or had not (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42, 1.36 p = 0.34). The results of this show that there are no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post-operative necrosis and infection in the case of endarticular surgery of the heel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ye, L., Su, Y., Fan, Y., & Wu, M. (2024, February 1). Effect of bone grafting on postoperative wound infection and marginal necrosis in patients with calcane fractures. International Wound Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14660

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free