Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport simulation

45Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The characterization of aleatory hydrogeological parameter uncertainty has traditionally been accomplished using probability theory. However, when consideration is given to epistemic as well as aleatory uncertainty, probability theory is not necessarily appropriate. This is especially the case where expert opinion is regarded as a suitable source of information. When experts opine upon the uncertainty of a parameter value, both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties are introduced and must be modeled appropriately. A novel approach to expert-provided parameter uncertainty characterization can be defined that bridges an historical gap between probability theory and fuzzy set theory. Herein, a random set, a generalization of a random variable is employed to formalize expert knowledge, and fuzzy sets are used to propagate this uncertainty to model estimates of contaminant transport. The resultant random set-based concentration estimates are shown to be more general than the corresponding random variable estimates. In some cases, the random set-based results are shown as upper and lower probabilities that bound the corresponding random variable's cumulative distribution function. Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ross, J. L., Ozbek, M. M., & Pinder, G. F. (2009). Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport simulation. Water Resources Research, 45(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free