Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Peer review is considered by many to be a fundamental component of scientific publishing. In this context, open peer review (OPR) has gained popularity in recent years as a tool to increase transparency, rigor, and inclusivity in research. But how does OPR really affect the review process? How does OPR impact specific groups, such as early career researchers? This editorial explores and discusses these aspects as well as some suggested actions for journals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henriquez, T. (2023, September 1). Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher. MBio. American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01948-23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free