Social explanation: Structures, stories, and ontology. A reply to díaz león, saul, and sterken

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In response to commentaries by Esa Díaz León, Jennifer Saul, and Rachel Sterken, I develop more fully my views on the role of structure in social and metaphysical explanation. Although I believe that social agency, quite generally, occurs within practices and structures, the relevance of structure depends on the sort of questions we are asking and what interventions we are considering. The emphasis on questions is also relevant in considering metaphysical and meta-metaphysical issues about realism with respect to gender and race. I aim to demonstrate that tools we develop in the context of critical social theory can change the questions we ask, what forms of explanation are called for, and how we do philosophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haslanger, S. (2018). Social explanation: Structures, stories, and ontology. A reply to díaz león, saul, and sterken. Disputatio. Sciendo. https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2018-0015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free