Abstract
IN THIS PAPER I WILL SHOW THAT THE OMNITEMPORALITY OF TRUTH DOES INDEED IMPLY FATALISM IF THE PAST IS UNCHANGEABLE. I THEN ARGUE THAT IT IS VERY LIKELY INDEED THAT THE PAST IS UNCHANGEABLE AND THUS, SINCE IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT FATALISM IS FALSE, IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT THE DOCTRINE OF THE OMNITEMPORALITY OF TRUTH IS FALSE. I ARGUE THAT THE REJECTION OF THE OMNITEMPORALITY OF TRUTH HAS NO UNDESIRABLE CONSEQUENCES FOR EITHER LOGIC OR THEOLOGY, THAT IN FACT THE LOGICAL AND THEOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE REJECTION OF THE OMNITEMPORALITY OF TRUTH ARE BENEFICIAL TO BOTH DISCIPLINES.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Purtill, R. L. (1988). Fatalism and the Omnitemporality of Truth. Faith and Philosophy, 5(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19885223
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.