Ebstein anomaly after tricuspid valve replacement needing pacemaker implantation: Case submitted by Christopher J. McLeod, MBChB, PhD

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

1. The presence of a prosthetic tricuspid valve is a relative but not absolute contraindication to endocardial pacing. 2. Epicardial pacing is a good option but does involve more surgery. 3. Innovative endocardial approaches, such as the leadless pacemaker, can be considered depending on the indication to pace. 4. Hybrid procedures (part endocardial and part epicardial) and newer leads (lumenless leads) can be used in some patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balaji, S., Mandapati, R., & Webb, G. D. (2018). Ebstein anomaly after tricuspid valve replacement needing pacemaker implantation: Case submitted by Christopher J. McLeod, MBChB, PhD. In Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Case-Based Approach (pp. 39–46). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-48568-5.00005-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free