Abstract
There is no agreement among palaeobiologists or biologists as towhether, or to what extent, there are limits on diversification and species numbers. Here, we posit that part of the disagreement stems from: (i) the lack of explicit criteria for defining the relevant species pools, which may be defined phylogenetically, ecologically or geographically; (ii) assumptions that must be made when extrapolating from population-level logistic growth to macro-evolutionary diversification; and (iii) too much emphasis being placed on fixed carrying capacities, rather than taking into account the opportunities for increased species richness on evolutionary timescales, for example, owing to increased biologically available energy, increased habitat complexity and the ability of many clades to better extract resources from the environment, or to broaden their resource base. Thus, we argue that a more effective way of assessing the evidence for and against the ideas of bound versus unbound diversification is through appropriate definition of the relevant species pools, and through explicitmodelling of diversity-dependent diversificationwith time-varying carrying capacities. Here,we showthat time-varying carrying capacities, either increases or decreases, can be accommodated through changing intrinsic diversification rates (diversity-independent effects), or changing the effects of crowding (diversity-dependent effects).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Marshall, C. R., & Quental, T. B. (2016). The uncertain role of diversity dependence in species diversification and the need to incorporate time-varying carrying capacities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1691). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0217
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.