Can SoTL Generate High Quality Research while Maintaining its Commitment to Inclusivity?

  • McSweeney J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) faces an emerging challenge as it seeks to balance commitments to disciplinary inclusivity and scholarly quality. We undertake a scoping review of 64 articles across three leading SoTL journals to investigate how the literature balances these twin commitments by exploring what questions are being asked, what methods are being used, and how these may be impacting the inferences that are being made within that scholarship. We advocate for a more focused definition of SoTL that can help reinforce its legitimacy within institutional power structures of scholarship, and for partnerships across disciplinary boundaries to be a central pillar of SoTL that is both high quality and disciplinarily inclusive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McSweeney, J., & Schnurr, M. (2023). Can SoTL Generate High Quality Research while Maintaining its Commitment to Inclusivity? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2023.17104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free