Why Adverse Outcome Pathways Need to be FAIR

12Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) provide evidence for demonstrating and assessing causality between measurable toxicological mechanisms and human or environmental adverse effects. AOPs have gained increasing attention over the past decade and are believed to provide the necessary steppingstone for more effective risk assessment of chemicals and materials and moving beyond the need for animal testing. However, as with all types of data and knowledge today, AOPs need to be reusable by machines, i.e., machine-actionable, in order to reach their full impact potential. Machine-actionability is supported by the FAIR principles, which guide findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of data and knowledge. Here, we describe why AOPs need to be FAIR and touch on aspects such as the improved visibility and the increased trust that FAIRification of AOPs provides.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wittwehr, C., Clerbaux, L. A., Edwards, S., Angrish, M., Mortensen, H., Carusi, A., … Nymark, P. (2023). Why Adverse Outcome Pathways Need to be FAIR. Altex, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2307131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free