Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Fixation Versus Revision

17Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFX) are complications of both total hip and knee arthroplasty and may be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty. Differences in treatment and fracture location may be related to patient demographics and lead to differences in cost. Our study examined the effects of demographics and treatment of knee and hip PPFXs on length of stay (LOS) and cost. Methods: Of all, 932 patients were identified with hip or knee PPFXs in the National Inpatient Sample from January 2013 to September 2015. Age, gender, race, mortality, comorbidity level, LOS, total cost, procedure type, geographic region, and hospital type were recorded. A generalized linear regression model was conducted to analyze the effect of fracture type on LOS and cost. Results: Differences in gender (66% vs 83.7% female, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ragland, K., Reif, R., Karim, S., Sexton, K. W., Cherney, S. M., Stambough, J. B., & Mears, S. C. (2020). Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Fixation Versus Revision. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459320939550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free