Are There Larger Stellar Velocity Dispersions in Low-redshift Type 1 AGNs than in Type 2 AGNs?

  • Zhang X
11Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to check the Unified Model (UM) for the expected similar stellar velocity dispersions between Type 1 and Type 2 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and then to provide further clues on black hole (BH) mass properties. Unlike previous comparisons of BH masses estimated from M BH – σ relations for Type 2 AGNs and from virial BH masses for Type 1 AGNs, reliable stellar velocity dispersions σ measured from absorption features around 4000 Å are directly compared between the thus far largest samples of 6260 low-redshift ( z < 0.3) Type 1 AGNs and almost all Type 2 AGNs in SDSS DR12. Although half of Type 1 AGNs do not have a measured σ due to unapparent absorption features overwhelmed by AGN activities, both properties of the mean spectra of Type 1 AGNs with and without a measured σ and a positive dependence of σ on the [O iii ] luminosity can lead to a statistically larger σ for all Type 1 AGNs compared to the 6260 Type 1 AGNs with measured stellar velocity dispersions. Then, direct σ comparisons can lead to a statistically larger σ in Type 1 AGNs, with a confidence level higher than 10 σ , after considering the necessary effects of different redshifts and different central AGN activities. Although Type 1 AGNs have a σ of only about (9 ± 3)% larger than Type 2 AGNs, the difference cannot be well explained at the current stage. Unless there is strong evidence to support different M BH – σ relations or to support quite different evolutionary histories between Type 1 and Type 2 AGNs, the statistically larger σ in Type 1 AGNs provides a strong challenge to the UM of AGNs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X. (2022). Are There Larger Stellar Velocity Dispersions in Low-redshift Type 1 AGNs than in Type 2 AGNs? The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 261(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac6bfe

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free