Clinical Decision Support for Ordering CTA-PE Studies in the Emergency Department—A Pilot on Feasibility and Clinical Impact in a Tertiary Medical Center

12Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the feasibility and impact of Clinical Decision Support for imaging ordering. Methods: A survey of 231 emergency providers identified Computed tomography angiography (CTA)-Pulmonary embolism (PE) as an overutilized study. We developed an algorithm that combined established risk scores to stratify patients for PE work-up (recommendations: CTA, D-dimer or no further testing); the algorithm was integrated into the Epic Radiology Information Ordering System. Results: Among 872 studies requested, 479 (55%) received a recommendation to change their order: 6 (1.3%) were cancelled; 13 (2.7%) changed to a D-dimer, and 460 (96%) proceeded with CTA. Of the 853 studies conducted, 8.2% were positive for PE. The algorithm had good discriminatory power with positivity rates of 12.0% (CT), 10.0% (D-dimer), and 2.6% (no further testing). Compliance with the recommendation ranged from 12%–68% (mean 45%) with 10% correlation between compliance and positivity rates. Conclusion: While the CDS algorithm was accurate, it had only a minimal impact on ordering practices, in part due to heterogeneity in physician adherence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goehler, A., Moore, C., Manne-Goehler, J. M., Arango, J., D’Amato, L., Forman, H. P., & Weinreb, J. (2019). Clinical Decision Support for Ordering CTA-PE Studies in the Emergency Department—A Pilot on Feasibility and Clinical Impact in a Tertiary Medical Center. Academic Radiology, 26(8), 1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free