Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair in children

62Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The prevalence of moderate-to-severe pain after inguinal hernia repair (IHR) in adults is ∼10. Two studies with very long follow-up periods (16.8 and 49 yr, respectively) have, however, suggested that the risk of developing chronic pain is much lower in children. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of chronic pain 648 months after IHR in children.Methods Postal questionnaires were sent to 156 children who had undergone IHR between the age of 6 months and 12 yr. The children were asked to recall the duration of postoperative pain, if necessary with help from their parents, and to describe the intensity and character of their pain, if the pain was still present. Children with chronic pain were offered quantitative sensory testing (QST), and a surgical examination, including ultrasound, in order to exclude hernia recurrence.Results Ninety-eight children, mean (sd) age 7.8 (2.6) yr, answered the questionnaire. Their age at the time of surgery was mean (sd) 4.6 (2.4) yr, and the follow-up period was mean (sd) 3.2 (1.3) yr. Five children (5.1, 95 confidence interval: 0.759.5) had pain located in the inguinal region, and three of these children underwent further examination. There was no hernia recurrence, but QST revealed pinprick hyperalgesia and decreased pressure pain thresholds on the operated side in all three children.Conclusions The prevalence of chronic pain after IHR in children is 5.1, which is lower than the prevalence reported after adult hernia repair. © The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kristensen, A. D., Ahlburg, P., Lauridsen, M. C., Jensen, T. S., & Nikolajsen, L. (2012). Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 109(4), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes250

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free