Optimal cut-off points of sagittal spinopelvic parameters as a morphological parameter to predict efficiency in nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency for lumbar facet joint pain: A retrospective study

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: After proper patient selection, anatomically correct pulsed radiofrequency of the lumbar facet joints provide long-term pain relief in a routine clinical setting. In the study, we performed an analysis of clinical and radiological predictive factors and provide the scientific basis for this promising modality. Methods: The study included 198 patients with lower back pain due to lumbar facet joint disease who underwent medial branch block and pulsed radiofrequency during the period 2015–2019. According to the improvement in pain score, the patients were divided into good and poor outcome groups. Clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Results: The multivariable analysis revealed the predictive factors, including lumbar lordo-sis, lower lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, the number of facet joints, old compression fracture with/without vertebroplasty, and post lumbar fusion procedures. Conclusion: With the results of this study, we demonstrated that the improved outcome after the surgery was related to lumbar lordosis, lower lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, the number of facet joints, old compression fracture with/without vertebroplasty, and the lumbar fusion procedures. Old compression fractures and lumbar fusion would change the radiological factors and cause refractory lumbar facet joint pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liang, C. L., Wang, S. W., Chen, H. J., Tsai, Y. D., Chen, J. S., Wang, H. K., & Wang, K. W. (2021). Optimal cut-off points of sagittal spinopelvic parameters as a morphological parameter to predict efficiency in nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency for lumbar facet joint pain: A retrospective study. Journal of Pain Research, 14, 1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S303979

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free