Conduct Problems in Children and Adolescents: A Twin Study

51Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Evidence supports a genetic influence on conduct problems as a continuous measure of behavior and as a diagnostic category. However, there is a lack of studies using a genetically informative design combined with several different informants and different settings. Objectives: To examine genetic and environmental influences on conduct problems rated by parent and teacher reports and self-reports and to determine whether their ratings reflect a common underlying phenotype. Design: A twin study design was used to examine conduct problem scores from ratings by teachers, parents, and twins themselves. Setting: General community. Participants: Twins aged 5 to 17 years participating in the Cardiff Study of All Wales and North England Twins (CaStANET) project. Main Outcome Measures: Conduct problem scale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Results: Conduct problem scores were significantly heritable based on parent and teacher reports and self-reports. Combining data from all 3 informants showed that they are rating a common underlying phenotype of pervasive conduct problems that is entirely genetic, while teacher ratings show separate genetic influences that are not shared with other raters. Conclusions: Conduct problems are significantly heritable based on parent and teacher reports and self-reports, and are also influenced by environmental effects that impinge uniquely on children from the same family. There is a cross-situational conduct problems' phenotype, underlying the behavior measured by all informants, that is wholly genetic in origin. No significant influence of shared environmental effects was found.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scourfield, J., Van Den Bree, M., Martin, N., & McGuffin, P. (2004). Conduct Problems in Children and Adolescents: A Twin Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(5), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.489

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free