Use of mesalazine slow release suppositories 1 g three times per week to maintain remission of ulcerative proctitis: A randomised double blind placebo controlled multicentre study

94Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background - Daily administration of rectal formulations of mesalazine is effective in preventing relapse of ulcerative proctitis. Maintenance of remission with lower doses would be an advantage. Aim - The efficacy of mesalazine suppositories (Pentasa) 1 g three times a week ν placebo to maintain remission in patients with cryptogenetic proctitis was studied. Methods - Ninety five patients with cryptogenetic proctitis were randomised within two weeks of remission to receive for one year or until relapse three suppositories per week of either Pentasa (n = 48) or placebo (n = 47). In the case of a relapse, the patients received one suppository/day. Results - It was found that 25 of 48 subjects ν 18 of 47 remained in remission in the mesalazine and placebo groups respectively. The relapse rate was lower in the mesalazine group for the following time intervals: 0-90 days (19% ν 38%, p = 0.035), 0-180 days (29% ν 54%, p = 0.017), 0-270 days (38% ν 60%, p = 0.031), and 0-365 days (48% ν 62%, p = 0.18). Treatment of relapse with one suppository/day induced remission in 11 of 18 and 2 of 26 patients in the mesalazine and placebo groups respectively (p = 0.001). Overall, 61% ν 28% patients remained in the protocol and were in remission at one year (p = 0.001). Tolerance was good. Conclusion - Mesalazine suppositories 1 g three times a week are effective for preventing relapses of cryptogenetic proctitis. Increasing the dose to 1 g/day is effective in a high proportion of subjects who relapsed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marteau, P., Grand, J., Foucault, M., & Rambaud, J. C. (1998). Use of mesalazine slow release suppositories 1 g three times per week to maintain remission of ulcerative proctitis: A randomised double blind placebo controlled multicentre study. Gut, 42(2), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.42.2.195

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free