Repeat general anaesthesia for paediatric dentistry

  • Harrison M
  • Nutting L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate patterns of referral, disease and treatment for healthy children who had received two or more dental general anaesthetics (DGA) for exodontia. METHODS: Records from 200 episodes of repeat DGA were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of patients at first referral was 5y4m, and the mean interval before repeat was 22 months. Self-referrals rose from 14% at DGA1 to 30% at DGA2. New caries at second referral, where all diagnosed disease had been treated at DGA1, accounted for only 15% of the total. Where a specific request was made in the referral, only 8% of letters matched the charting made in hospital. 30% of all specific requests were honoured, but then required treatment for previously diagnosed caries at DGA2.75% of single-tooth extractions required repeat DGA for caries left at DGA1. CONCLUSIONS: It may be too optimistic to address only the most grossly diseased teeth when a child requires GA exodontia. A more radical treatment-planning approach, combining primary care, secondary care and public health considerations, may be required to avoid the unnecessary use of DGA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harrison, M., & Nutting, L. (2000). Repeat general anaesthesia for paediatric dentistry. British Dental Journal, 189(1), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free