SARC-F and six modified versions: prognostic role for prolonged hospital stay and 1-year mortality in older inpatients

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background & aims: The Strength, Assistance with Walking, Rising from a Chair, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire was proposed to screen sarcopenia. However, its limited sensitivity may compromise its prognostic value. Since its introduction, several adapted SARC-F-based approaches have been proposed, although their ability to predict clinical outcomes among older hospitalized individuals remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of SARC-F and six modified versions in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. Methods: Cohort study with prospective data collection. Older adults (N = 236, 69.8 ± 7.5 years old) hospitalized in medical or surgical wards were included. Outcomes of interest were 1-year mortality and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). The original SARC-F was applied. Additional adapted approaches were explored: (1) SARC-CalF (including calf circumference, CC); (2) BMI−adjusted SARC-CalF (using BMI-adjusted CC); (3) SARC-F + mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC); (4) SARC-F + age and body mass (SARC-F EBM); (5) SARC-CalF + MUAC; and (6) BMI−adjusted SARC-CalF + MUAC. Suggestive signs of sarcopenia were SARC-F scores ≥ 4, SARC-F EBM scores ≥ 12, and scores ≥ 11 for all other SARC-based approaches. Results: SARC-F EBM was the approach identifying the lowest rate of suggestive signs of sarcopenia (25.9%), while BMI−adjusted SARC-CalF + MUAC identified the highest rate (79.2%). All SARC-F-based approaches were associated with higher odds of prolonged LOS (OR ranged from 2.05 to 3.31). SARC-CalF model had the highest adjusted AUC for LOS prediction (0.64). Except for SARC-F and SARC-F + EBM, all approaches were associated with a higher risk of 1-year mortality (HR adjusted ranged from 2.07 to 11.34). BMI−adjusted SARC-CalF + MUAC exhibited the highest mortality prediction based on the C-index (0.75). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that all SARC-F-based approaches are linked to prolonged LOS, and almost all approaches were also linked to 1-year mortality. We also introduce the novel BMI−adjusted SARC-CalF + MUAC version, pending future validation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nascimento, T. G., Fayh, A. P. T., Silva, F. M., Costa, E. C., Silva-Filho, J. Z., Cintra, J. F. M., … Costa-Pereira, J. P. (2026). SARC-F and six modified versions: prognostic role for prolonged hospital stay and 1-year mortality in older inpatients. BMC Geriatrics, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07012-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free