Was humpty dumpty right?: Towards a functional definition of e-learning

10Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper discusses the importance of definitions in the context of academic discussion, highlights the inconsistent terminology used to describe e-learning, and examines a range of different definitions of e-learning used by academic authors since 2011. Following an outline of the methodology, the paper identifies 15 unique definitions of e-learning in peer-reviewed papers published between January 2011 and December 2022. The 15 definitions are analysed for significant properties, and these properties are reviewed to assess whether they are essential components of e-learning. The paper then proposes a functional definition of e-learning, including all essential elements of e-learning and eliminating elements that may be present in some, but not all, instances of e-learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Neill, A. (2024). Was humpty dumpty right?: Towards a functional definition of e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2093–2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11900-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free