Weekend effect in acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of observational studies

28Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The effect of a weekend compared with a weekday hospital admission on patient outcomes after an acute coronary syndrome is unclear. This study aims to determine whether collectively there is a weekend effect in acute coronary syndrome. Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies examining the association between weekend compared to weekday admission at any time of the day and early mortality (in-hospital or 30-day). A search was performed on Medline and Embase and relevant studies were pooled using random effects meta-analysis for risk of early mortality. Additional analyses were performed considering only more recent studies (conducted after 2005) and by patient group (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non-STEMI [NSTEMI]), as well as meta-regression according to starting year and mean year of study. Results: A total of 18 studies were included with over 14 million participants incorporating 3 million weekend and over 11.5 million weekday admissions and the rates of mortality were 19.2% and 23.4%, respectively. The pooled results of all 18 studies suggest that weekend admission was associated with a small increased risk of early mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.09). The results for subgroups of STEMI and NSTEMI cohorts were not statistically significant and timing of admission after 2005 had minimal influence on the results (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95–1.17). Conclusions: There is a small weekend effect for admission with acute coronary syndrome that has persisted over time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kwok, C. S., Al-Dokheal, M., Aldaham, S., Rushton, C., Butler, R., Kinnaird, T., … Mamas, M. A. (2019). Weekend effect in acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of observational studies. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 8(5), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872618762634

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free