Human electromagnetic and haemodynamic networks systematically converge in unimodal cortex and diverge in transmodal cortex

42Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AWUho: lPe-lebaraseinconnefiurrmatlhcaotamllmheuandiicnagtlieovnelissatryepriecparlelyseenstetidmcaorteredcftlryo:m statistical associations among electromagnetic or haemodynamic time-series. The relationship between functional network architectures recovered from these 2 types of neural activity remains unknown. Here, we map electromagnetic networks (measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG)) to haemodynamic networks (measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)). We find that the relationship between the 2 modalities is regionally heterogeneous and systematically follows the cortical hierarchy, with close correspondence in unimodal cortex and poor correspondence in transmodal cortex. Comparison with the Big- Brain histological atlas reveals that electromagnetic-haemodynamic coupling is driven by laminar differentiation and neuron density, suggesting that the mapping between the 2 modalities can be explained by cytoarchitectural variation. Importantly, haemodynamic connectivity cannot be explained by electromagnetic activity in a single frequency band, but rather arises from the mixing of multiple neurophysiological rhythms. Correspondence between the two is largely driven by MEG functional connectivity at the beta (15 to 29 Hz) frequency band. Collectively, these findings demonstrate highly organized but only partly overlapping patterns of connectivity in MEG and fMRI functional networks, opening fundamentally new avenues for studying the relationship between cortical microarchitecture and multimodal connectivity patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shafiei, G., Baillet, S., & Misic, B. (2022). Human electromagnetic and haemodynamic networks systematically converge in unimodal cortex and diverge in transmodal cortex. PLoS Biology, 20(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001735

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free