Good thinking or gut feeling? Cognitive reflection and intuition in traders, bankers and financial non-experts

44Citations
Citations of this article
140Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The current study investigated differences in decision-making style and risk-taking between financial traders, non-trading bank employees, and people not working in finance. Traders scored significantly higher than participants in the other two groups on the cognitive reflection test (CRT) which measures the tendency to inhibit automatic but frequently false responses in reasoning tasks. Scores for traders compared to people outside the banking sector were also higher on a self-rated scale for reflective thinking in decision-making, but there were no differences in self-rated intuitive thinking between groups. Financial risktaking correlated with cognitive reflection scores and was significantly lower in the nonexpert group compared to the other groups working in financial services. Traders in the current study showed no elevated preference to use 'intuition ' in their decision-making compared to other groups. Overall, these results indicate that compared to non-expert participants financial traders have a higher self-rated tendency for reflective thinking and a greater propensity to inhibit the use of mental shortcuts (heuristics) in decision-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thoma, V., White, E., Panigrahi, A., Strowger, V., & Anderson, I. (2015). Good thinking or gut feeling? Cognitive reflection and intuition in traders, bankers and financial non-experts. PLoS ONE, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123202

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free