Doing nothing? An ethnography of patients’ (In)activity on an acute stroke unit

7Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Health research has begun to pay increasing attention to inactivity in its broadest sense as lack of meaningful activity and boredom. Few studies however have taken a critical look at this phenomenon. We explore (in)activity drawing on ethnographic data from observations in an acute stroke unit and post-discharge interviews with stroke survivors and their families. Four themes emerged that explain patients’ (in)activity: (i) planned activities; (ii) ‘doing nothing’, (iii) the material environment of the unit; (iv) interactions with staff. Considering these themes, we seek to problematise received conceptual and methodological approaches to understanding (in)activity. We argue that (in)activity is best conceived not as lack of action or meaning, but as a situated practice encompassing both bodily and mental activities that reflect and reproduce the way in which life is collectively organised within a specific healthcare setting.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costa, A., Jones, F., Kulnik, S. T., Clarke, D., Honey, S., & Robert, G. (2022). Doing nothing? An ethnography of patients’ (In)activity on an acute stroke unit. Health (United Kingdom), 26(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320969784

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free