Burden of Diabetes and Prediabetes in Nepal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

40Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Unhealthy behaviors, such as energy-dense food choices and a sedentary lifestyle, both of which are established risk factors for diabetes, are common and increasing among Nepalese adults. Previous studies have reported a wide variation in the prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes in Nepal, and thus a more reliable pooled estimate is needed. Furthermore, Nepal underwent federalization in 2015, and the province-specific prevalence, which is necessary for the de novo provincial government to formulate local health policies, is lacking. This study aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature on various aspects of diabetes in Nepal, i.e., the prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes as well as of the awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in Nepal. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched three electronic databases—PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science—using a comprehensive search strategy to identify eligible studies published up to April 2, 2020. Data on prevalence estimates of prediabetes and diabetes were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis using a random effect model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess heterogeneity across the studies. The quality of included studies was assessed using the New Castle-Ottawa scale. Results: We included 14 eligible studies that comprised a total of 44,129 participants and 3517 diabetes cases. Half of the included studies had good quality. Overall, the prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes was 9.2% (95% CI 6.6–12.6%) and 8.5% (95% CI 6.9–10.4%), respectively. Among the participants with diabetes, only 52.7% (95% CI 41.7–63.4%) were aware of their diabetes status, and 45.3% (95% CI 31.6–59.8%) were taking antidiabetic medications. Nearly one-third of those under antidiabetic treatment (36.7%; 95% CI 21.3–53.3%) had their blood glucose under control. The prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes gradually increased with increasing age and was more prevalent among males and urban residents. There was a wide variation in diabetes prevalence across the provinces in Nepal, the lowest 2% in Province 6 to the highest 10% in Province 3 and Province 4. Conclusions: The prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes was high in Nepal, while its awareness, treatment, and control were low. Our findings call for urgent nationwide public health action in Nepal.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53357Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

18932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus

0
5567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Burden of chronic kidney disease in the general population and high-risk groups in South Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sodium alginate-based drug delivery for diabetes management: A review

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of, and risk factors for, diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh: Evidence from the national survey using a multilevel Poisson regression model with a robust variance

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shrestha, N., Mishra, S. R., Ghimire, S., Gyawali, B., & Mehata, S. (2020, September 1). Burden of Diabetes and Prediabetes in Nepal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diabetes Therapy. Adis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00884-0

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

68%

Researcher 7

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

49%

Nursing and Health Professions 16

30%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 22

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free