Recovering the Social Dimension of Reflection

  • Connell M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Upon its publication in 1983, Schön's "The Reflective Practitioner" became almost instantly influential in the design of teacher education programs in North America. Within eight years of its publication, it was nearly impossible to find a teacher educator not emphasizing the importance of reflection (Erlandson, 2007; Zeichner & Tabachinick, 1981). Despite a paucity of research establishing its benefits, the practice continues to play an important role in teacher education programs, including programs for preservice teacher education located at Catholic colleges and universities. After describing how reflection in teacher education is popularly conceived and after reviewing critiques of the practice as currently understood and commonly promoted in teacher education programs, I will propose in this article an understanding that recasts reflection as a social practice that (1) has experience as its principal object; and (2) takes place in social encounters among teachers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Connell, M. T. (2014). Recovering the Social Dimension of Reflection. Journal of Catholic Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1702022014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free