Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: a systematic literature review

55Citations
Citations of this article
309Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Universal Design for Learning is not widely used in postsecondary STEM education. The purpose of this literature review is to synthesize the empirical literature using Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary STEM education for all learners. The criteria for this review are (a) empirical literature in (b) peer reviewed journals (c) published after 2006. Keywords used were STEM, UDL/UDI/Universal Design, and postsecondary/university/college/higher education. This review identified four studies and three literature reviews that met the search criteria; the analysis of the identified literature provides a model for how Universal Design for Learning can impact postsecondary STEM instruction, including an increase in inclusive teaching methods and self-advocacy from students with disabilities, and leads to recommendations for additional research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schreffler, J., Vasquez, E., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019, December 1). Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free