Information overload regarding COVID-19: Adaptation and validation of the cancer information overload scale

10Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Access to excessive information from multiple sources relating to COVID-19 in a short span of time can have detrimental effects on individuals. Aim: The study aims to validate Corona Information Overload Scale (CoIOS) by adaptation of Cancer Information Overload scale (CIOS) on English speaking Indian citizens. Materials and Methods: An online survey was carried out using Google Form on 300 individuals out of whom 183 responded. The CoIOS was to be filled up. It was an 8 item Likert type scale with responses ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.” Results: Principal components analysis showed two components with an initial eigenvalue > unity (3.38 and 1.09), with 42.33% and 13.64% of variance, respectively, making a total of 55.97% variance. The composite reliability value was also found to be 0.789 and 0.815 for factors I and II, respectively, convergent validity and discriminant validity calculation also affirmed good construct reliability. Conclusion: CoIOS appears to be a valid and reliable scale for measuring health information overload in relation to COVID-19. However, it has a two factor component, namely “excessiveness of information” and “rejection of information. .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarkhel, S., Bakhla, A. K., Praharaj, S. K., & Ghosal, M. K. (2020). Information overload regarding COVID-19: Adaptation and validation of the cancer information overload scale. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 62(5), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_974_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free