Abstract
Purpose: The growing number of people with multiple problems in different areas of life means that cross-domain interprofessional collaboration is becoming increasingly important. This study aims to focus on interprofessional collaboration between professionals from social work and financial and employment service organizations in The Netherlands. This type of cross-domain collaboration is still mostly superficial, and limited empirical knowledge is available about its beneficial factors. Design/methodology/approach: The interprofessional collaboration model of Mulvale et al. (2016) was used as theoretical background for the research methodology and to reflect on the findings of our study. Data was collected through a qualitative study among professionals (N = 18) from social work and financial and employment service organizations in three different Dutch municipalities. Findings: Similar team-level collaboration mechanisms of Mulvale et al.’s (2016) model were seen within this study. Joint client meetings were very beneficial for the interprofessional collaboration. Further beneficial factors include the decision-making process, team vision, client as an equal member, open communication and the appointment of a coordinator. Research limitations/implications: Further special attention is needed to determine how best to allocate co-ordinating tasks, and how organizational and policy contexts affect the functioning of interprofessional collaborative teams. Originality/value: This study offers an empirical view on a cross-domain collaboration between social work and financial and employment service organizations, by using Mulvale et al.’s (2016) model. In addition, this study also offers special attention to the role of the client in interprofessional collaborative teams.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nouwen, C., Driesen, I., Verharen, L., & Van Regenmortel, T. (2023). Breaking down barriers of interprofessional collaboration between social work and financial and employment service organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(8), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2023-3659
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.