Appropriating Donald Schön

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Donald Schön embraces a constructivist approach to learning and research., characterising designing as a reflective conversation between designer and the materials of a design situation. Accordingly, Schön's views on digital design support are based on his valuing of indeterminacy, surprise and ambiguity as opportunities to develop new understanding and insight. His criticism of technical rationality is directed towards the privileging of formal and codified knowledge over embodied and tacit forms of knowing. While Schön's work is increasingly acknowledged in recent CAAD research, respective publications typically remain within the technical rationality perspective. Based on several characteristic examples, this paper examines how Schön's ideas are absorbed into a perspective incongruous to his own, concluding with a discussion of potential new research approaches that sustain Schön's values.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herr, C. M. (2009). Appropriating Donald Schön. In 2009 TAIWAN CAADRIA: Between Man and Machine - Integration, Intuition, Intelligence - Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (pp. 483–492). National Yunlin University of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2009.483

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free