Abstract
Dove and Straker question our interpretations of plumage from Late Cretaceous Canadian amber. Although we are able to refute concerns regarding both specimen taphonomy and misidentification as botanical fossils, unequivocal assignment to either birds or dinosaurs remains impossible, as we stated originally. However, reported observations and their further refinement herein are insufficient to falsify the hypothesized dinosaurian origin for protofeathers.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McKellar, R. C., Chatterton, B. D. E., Wolfe, A. P., & Currie, P. J. (2012, February 17). Response to comment on “A diverse assemblage of late cretaceous dinosaur and bird feathers from Canadian amber.” Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216484
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.