Reflections about handling interview data from third countries at European universities: Collaboration opportunities and/or risky business for participants and researchers?

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Through reflections about a case study concerning an unfeasible, planned research study on nurses’ working days during the COVID-19 pandemic, the article aims to describe and discuss legal and ethical challenges when conducting European-based research together with nurses in third countries. The article highlights how the General Data Protection Regulation challenges EU and non-EU research collaborations and research across borders in healthcare research. Digitally recorded interview data can be traced, putting both research participants and researchers at risk in relation to confidentiality, safety and potential critical views by national regimes. This raises ethical claims for research collaborations between EU and third countries and hampers the possibilities to make silent voices discernible through research. It is a questionable solution both to collaborate and not to collaborate with third countries such as China. Further reflections on the ways forward to facilitate research collaboration between EU and third countries are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Glasdam, S., Xu, H., & Stjernswärd, S. (2023). Reflections about handling interview data from third countries at European universities: Collaboration opportunities and/or risky business for participants and researchers? Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20571585221126594

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free