Clinical experience of intramuscular immunoglobulin for measles prophylaxis in children: Is it practical?

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Measles continues to be a public health concern world-wide. Vulnerable individuals including those in which vaccinations is contraindicated, may be reliant on normal human immunoglobulin (NHIG) prophylaxis in an aim to prevent disease. This paper will summarise and discuss a tertiary paediatric hospital's clinical experience and the practicalities of administering intramuscular (IM) NHIG to paediatric patients as per the current measles prophylaxis guidelines in Australia. Following potential exposure within the emergency department, 17 paediatric patients (0–15 years) were recommended IM NHIG for prophylaxis. The dose of NHIG ranged from 0.6 to 15 mL and required multiple (2–8) injections. Two patients required sedation for staff to safely administer the injections. Staff involved with these cases reported administering multiple injections to paediatric patients to be a traumatising experience. They also expressed views that the injection of large volumes via the IM route was an impractical method of administration. Based on this experience, we recommend intravenous immunoglobulin be considered when large volumes of NHIG are recommended intramuscularly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Philips, L., Young, M. K., Wallace, J., & Dobinson, H. C. (2020, March 1). Clinical experience of intramuscular immunoglobulin for measles prophylaxis in children: Is it practical? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14800

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free