Two-year follow-up after a six-week high-intensity training intervention study with breast cancer patients: physiological, psychological and immunological differences

9Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Previously we demonstrated the feasibility of a six-week-long combination of high-intensity interval endurance and strength training (HIT/HIRT) for women with nonmetastatic breast cancer leading to improvements in psychological well-being and performance. Now we report results of a 24-month follow-up. Methods: Previous intervention (IG, n = 10; 58.7 ± 8.4yrs) and control group (CG, n = 9; 58.8 ± 6.6yrs) were asked for follow-up examinations 12 (T12) and 24 months (T24) after cessation of the supervised training (POST). Medical history, mental well-being, performance and immunological variables were analyzed with respect to intervention start (PRE). Results: IG maximum oxygen consumption (⩒O2peak) 12%-improved POST (p = 0.05) and declined to baseline values T24, while CG ⩒O2peak increased 12% T24 (p = 0.01). IG strength (1RM) increased 31% POST (p < 0.001) and remained above baseline level T24 (p = 0.003), whereas CG 1RM slightly improved T24 (+19%, p = 0.034). IG Anxiety and Depression decreased POST and did not change until T24. IG C-reactive protein decreased POST and increased to pre-exercise levels T24. CG immunological/inflammatory/life quality markers did not change. Conclusions: Six weeks of HIT/HIRT by breast cancer patients can induce similar beneficial effects like two years of convalescence, but outcomes were unstable and showed a fast backslide in aerobic capacity, activity level and in pro-inflammatory state within 12 months.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION High-intensity interval endurance and strength training (HIT/HIRT) for female breast cancer patients was shown to improve psychological well-being and performance, but long-term effects/adherence are unknown. Significant backslides in aerobic capacity, activity level as well as in the pro-inflammatory response after one and two years are observed and should be monitored. Continuous supervision and/or support of breast cancer patients before, during, and after medical care due to poor training adherence when voluntarily executed is recommended.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schulz, S. V. W., Schumann, U., Otto, S., Kirsten, J., Treff, G., Janni, W., … Bizjak, D. A. (2022). Two-year follow-up after a six-week high-intensity training intervention study with breast cancer patients: physiological, psychological and immunological differences. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(17), 4813–4820. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1921861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free