Can routine clinical markers be used longitudinally to monitor antiretroviral therapy success in resource-limited settings?

37Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although routine clinical markers are used routinely to determine the stage of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, their use in monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy is poorly defined. Selected clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict first-line antiretroviral therapy success. No clinically meaningful variables were identified that predicted virologic or immunological success, implying that the CD4+ cell count and HIV type 1 RNA level data are required for optimal management of antiretroviral therapy. © 2006 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagchi, S., Kempf, M. C., Westfall, A. O., Maherya, A., Willig, J., & Saag, M. S. (2007). Can routine clinical markers be used longitudinally to monitor antiretroviral therapy success in resource-limited settings? Clinical Infectious Diseases, 44(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1086/510072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free