The statistical fairness field guide: perspectives from social and formal sciences

  • Carey A
  • Wu X
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Over the past several years, a multitude of methods to measure the fairness of a machine learning model have been proposed. However, despite the growing number of publications and implementations, there is still a critical lack of literature that explains the interplay of fair machine learning with the social sciences of philosophy, sociology, and law. We hope to remedy this issue by accumulating and expounding upon the thoughts and discussions of fair machine learning produced by both social and formal (i.e., machine learning and statistics) sciences in this field guide. Specifically, in addition to giving the mathematical and algorithmic backgrounds of several popular statistics-based fair machine learning metrics used in fair machine learning, we explain the underlying philosophical and legal thoughts that support them. Furthermore, we explore several criticisms of the current approaches to fair machine learning from sociological, philosophical, and legal viewpoints. It is our hope that this field guide helps machine learning practitioners identify and remediate cases where algorithms violate human rights and values.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carey, A. N., & Wu, X. (2023). The statistical fairness field guide: perspectives from social and formal sciences. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00183-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free