Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to contribute to the reflection on a potential integrative framework for the psychological sciences based on the target paper in this special issue “Psychology: A Giant with Feet of Clay” by Zagaria, Andò & Zennaro. The paper is organized in three parts. In the first part we will discuss whether introductory textbooks provide a solid and reasonable basis for an analysis of the quality of conceptualization of key concepts in the psychology as well as whether the epistemological analysis could provide arguments for a conclusion that the psychology is a “soft(er)” science. In the second part, we will formulate our reasons why we share with Zagaria, Andò & Zennaro the conclusion that the evolutionary psychology might play a significant role in our quest for the integrative framework, but also why we are not convinced that evolutionary psychology can be integrative enough. In the third part, we are going to formulate an alternative starting point for exploration of for an integrative framework for psychological sciences and their practical applications supporting individuals and communities in their quest for a meaningful and productive existence and navigation of their future lives.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Baucal, A., & Krstić, K. (2020). Searching for an Integrative Theoretical Framework for Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology is Needed, But Not Sufficient. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.