BACKGROUND: Transbronchial needle aspiration using endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUSTBNA), a new minimally invasive diagnostic procedure, has been used to evaluate intrathoracic lymph nodes. It has been reported that EBUS-TBNA can be performed safely under sedation and provides a high level of patient satisfaction. We aimed to describe perianesthetic data, and compare results regarding the agents of subjects undergoing EBUS-TBNA under deep sedation. METHODS: After ethics committee approval, perianesthetic data of 571 subjects undergoing EBUS-TBNA were analyzed retrospectively. Data were collected from anesthesia evaluation and observation forms. Four groups received anesthesia in the operating room as follows: propofol-midazolam (group PM), propofol-ketamine (group PK), propofol-ketamine-midazolam (group PKM), or propofol (group P). Dosage, number of anesthetic injection, hemodynamic variables, recovery time, complications, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: Propofol consumption was higher in groups P and PM compared with groups PK and PKM. Midazolam requirement was higher in group PM than in group PKM. Recovery time was shorter in group P compared with groups PK, PM, and PKM. It was also shorter in groups PK and PM compared with group PKM. All of these differences were statistically significant. Temporary desaturation (n = 41; 7%) and increased blood pressure (n = 78; 14%) were predominant complications. In groups PK and PKM, risk of developing hypertension was higher than in groups PM and P (P
CITATION STYLE
Sazak, H., Tunç, M., Alagöz, A., Pehlivanoğ Lu, P., Demirci, N. Y., Alıcı, İ. O., & Yılmaz, A. (2015). Assessment of perianesthesic data in subjects undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Respiratory Care, 60(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03547
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.