Why statistical testing and confidence intervals should not be used in comparative life cycle assessments based on Monte Carlo simulations

34Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the last years, it has been suggested to use statistical inferential methods, such as hypothesis testing or confidence intervals, to compare different products, services, or systems within comparative life cycle assessments based on Monte Carlo simulation results. However, the use of statistical inferential methods in such settings is fundamentally incorrect and should not be continued. In this article, we explain why and look closer at some related topics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

von Brömssen, C., & Röös, E. (2020). Why statistical testing and confidence intervals should not be used in comparative life cycle assessments based on Monte Carlo simulations. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(11), 2101–2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01827-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free