Indicators of quality in health care

190Citations
Citations of this article
203Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Systems of Quality Assurance are necessary, partly to advance service and professional development, and partly to provide accountability. Such systems require criteria and standards on the basis of which to conduct evaluation, but these are not easy to establish. Not only is there a tension between measurability and relevance, there is also variation in the appropriateness of different criteria between localities and countries. With increasing involvement of external evaluation, and increasing interest in international comparisons, there is concern over the validity of many criteria and standards, and over their inappropriate use. The literature has been reviewed, and a series of consensus meetings held by representatives of eleven European countries. Since criteria and standards are so difficult to agree and vary so widely with different contexts of care, it is necessary first to define and identify indicators of care which are likely to be valid across varying localities and countries. Criteria and standards can then be derived from these indicators. © 1997 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawrence, M., & Olesen, F. (1997). Indicators of quality in health care. European Journal of General Practice, 3(3), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814789709160336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free