2074. Performance and Impact Evaluation of Direct Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing on Antibiotic Treatment Accuracy in Clinical Setting

  • Kim J
  • Kim T
  • Song S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Timely and effective antibiotics treatment is crucial in early period of bacteremia. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is essential for choosing an optimal antibiotics treatment, but conventional AST requires 2 days from confirmation of blood culture positivity. Direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (dRAST) based on microfluidic agarose cannel chip technology determines antibiotic susceptibility by time lapse imaging in 6 hours. We evaluated the performance of dRAST to improve selection of adequate antibiotic in clinical practice settings. Methods. Two hundred eighty-three patients with positive blood culture (BC) bottles were included for analysis. BC bottles from these patients were processed by current microbiology analyzer: Microscan for Gram positive strains and VITEK2 for Gram-negative strains. At the same time, AST was performed using dRAST. The susceptibility results were reported to infectious diseases specialists who determine optimal antibiotics based on AST results. We compared the time differences and accuracy of dRAST with those of conventional method. Results. Of 283 patients, 117 (41.5%) patients were infected with Gram positive bacteria, 163 (57.4%) patients were infected with Gram negative bacteria and 3 (1.1%) patients were infected with Gram-positive and-negative bacteria. The total turnaround time for conventional method and dRAST from blood culture collection was 78.3 ± 27.0 and 55.9 ± 18.9 hours, respectively. Seventy-seven of 95 (81.1%) patients who received ineffective or suboptimal antibiotic treatment after confirming the results of Gram stain and 81 of 86 (94.2%) patients who received unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment could have received adjusted optimal treatment based on dRAST. Conclusion. The use of dRAST system would accelerate earlier effective antibiotic administration and reduce the antibiotic selective pressure in patients with bacteremia. Background. Rapid organism identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can improve time to adequate therapy (TTAT) and optimal (TTOT). The Accelerate Pheno™ system (ACC) can provide ID and AST results within 7 hours. The objective of this study was to assess the hypothetical impact of ACC on TTAT and TTOT in a hospital with an established antimicrobial stewardship program and rapid genotypic organism and resistance marker ID. Methods. Patients with positive blood cultures, at the, were retrospectively reviewed. ACC was run on unique blood cultures as part of the laboratory validation of the system. ACC results were not made available to clinicians. These results were utilized to determine the hypothetical impact on TTAT and TTOT that the ACC results would have had in real-time. This assessment was performed based on how clinicians modified antimicrobial

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J.-H., Kim, T. S., Song, S. H., Choi, J., Han, S., Kim, D. Y., … Park, W. B. (2018). 2074. Performance and Impact Evaluation of Direct Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing on Antibiotic Treatment Accuracy in Clinical Setting. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(suppl_1), S606–S606. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1730

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free