Why Special Populations Are Not the Target of Family Preservation Services: A Case for Program Reform

  • Denby R
  • Curtis C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The number of children who have been placed outside their homes of origin as a result of abuse, neglect, delinquency, emotional problems, or developmental disabilities, is astronomical and steadily increasing. Of this number, "special populations" like children of color continue to be disproportionately represented. Intensive family preservation, a program that attempts to reduce out-of-home placement rates, has not demonstrated empirically, a sustained record of success in the reduction of placement rates among special populations. The purpose of the current study was to understand the manner in which special populations are targeted for services by examining the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of a national sample of family preservation workers. Results indicate a significant bias against targeting family preservation services to special populations in general, and children of color in particular. Specific recommendations about the targeting of special populations are given.ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denby, R. W., & Curtis, C. M. (2003). Why Special Populations Are Not the Target of Family Preservation Services: A Case for Program Reform. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.2899

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free