Conflicting reports regarding the histopathological features of androgenic alopecia: Are biopsy location, hair diameter diversity, and relative hair follicle miniaturization partly to blame?

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite decades of study, debate persists over the role of inflammation, fibrosis, and prostaglandins in the histopathology of androgenic alopecia (AGA). This brief review proposes that inconsistent findings across histological studies are a consequence of three inadequately controlled variables: 1) biopsy location, 2) hair diameter diversity (HDD), and 3) relative hair follicle miniaturization (HFM) within and across subjects. We suggest new methodological considerations to improve AGA histopathological research, as well as a novel classification system to quantify HFM by its stages. Finally, we hypothesize a dynamic relationship between inflammation, fibrosis, and prostaglandin activity dependent on relative HFM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

English Jnr, R., & Ruiz, S. (2021). Conflicting reports regarding the histopathological features of androgenic alopecia: Are biopsy location, hair diameter diversity, and relative hair follicle miniaturization partly to blame? Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 14, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S306157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free