Top Altmetric Scores in the Parkinson's Disease Literature

30Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A new class of social web-based metrics for scholarly publications (altmetrics) has surfaced as a complement to traditional citation-based metrics. Our aim was to study and characterize those recent papers in the field of Parkinson's disease which had received the highest Altmetric Attention Scores and to compare this attention measure to the traditional metrics. The top 20 papers in our analysis covered a variety of topics, mainly new disease mechanisms, treatment options and risk factors for the development of PD. The main media sources for these high attention papers were news items and Twitter. The papers were published predominantly in high impact journals, suggesting a correlation between altmetrics and conventional metrics. One paper published in a relatively modest journal received a significant amount of attention, reflecting that public attention does not always parallel the traditional metrics. None of the most influential papers in PD, as reviewed by Ponce and Lozano (2011) made it to our list, suggesting that recent publications receive higher attention scores, and that altmetrics may omit older, seminal work in the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Araújo, R., Sorensen, A. A., Konkiel, S., & Bloem, B. R. (2017). Top Altmetric Scores in the Parkinson’s Disease Literature. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease, 7(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-179000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free