Abstract
Giving Reasons aims to provide an approach not only accurate, but comprehensive, to a systematic theory of argumentation. In the light of a distinction made by Vaz Ferreira between «thinking through systems» and «thinking through ideas to be taken into account», I would like to make some comments in order to provide a certain balance and somehow "open" the inchoative theoretical closure of the linguistic-pragmatic system offered in Giving Reasons. I am going to consider two cases in particular: the treatment of the very concept of argumentation and the transformation of Grice's Cooperative principle and Maxims into a sort of systematic framework to be applied to the study of fallacies.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Reñón, L. V. (2011). Pensar por sistemas y pensar por ideas a tener en cuenta. Unas notas a propósito de Giving Reasons. A linguistic-pragmatic approach to Argumentation Theory. Theoria-Revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia, 26(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2952
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.