Abstract
It is assumed that artworks having multiple instances must be abstracta, with instances as tokens; entailing that they are discovered not created and are modally inflexible-counterintuitive for those multiples (films, photographs) generated via what Wolterstorff terms a 'production artifact'. The generative process of such is causal-mechanical, differing only in complexity from the process whereby singular artworks, such as daguerrotypes, come into being. This chapter surveys arguments for the 'abstracta' view and evades implications of this view by construing such works as continuants. The issue, it argues, is the principle whereby certain things can be grouped as instances 'of' a work. It examines principles of grouping outside the arts that reflect shared causal histories and suggests we can explain the repeatability of multiples generated through production artefacts in terms of those histories; thereby treating the works as concrete events to which the instances stand in a common relation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Davies, D. (2013). What Type of “Type” is a Film? In Art and Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691494.003.0013
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.