What Type of 'Type' is a Film?

10Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is assumed that artworks having multiple instances must be abstracta, with instances as tokens; entailing that they are discovered not created and are modally inflexible-counterintuitive for those multiples (films, photographs) generated via what Wolterstorff terms a 'production artifact'. The generative process of such is causal-mechanical, differing only in complexity from the process whereby singular artworks, such as daguerrotypes, come into being. This chapter surveys arguments for the 'abstracta' view and evades implications of this view by construing such works as continuants. The issue, it argues, is the principle whereby certain things can be grouped as instances 'of' a work. It examines principles of grouping outside the arts that reflect shared causal histories and suggests we can explain the repeatability of multiples generated through production artefacts in terms of those histories; thereby treating the works as concrete events to which the instances stand in a common relation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davies, D. (2013). What Type of “Type” is a Film? In Art and Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691494.003.0013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free